Quick Read
- Kick streamer Clavicular was banned after allegedly running over a man with a Tesla Cybertruck during a livestream.
- Footage of the incident went viral, sparking debate about self-defense and platform responsibility.
- No official confirmation exists regarding the victim’s condition; Clavicular and Kick have not released statements.
On Christmas Eve 2025, the world of online streaming was shaken by a dramatic and controversial event. Braden Peter, known to his followers as Clavicular, a 19-year-old American streamer, was banned from the Kick platform after a livestream in which he allegedly ran over a man with a Tesla Cybertruck. The incident unfolded in real time, and its repercussions were felt almost immediately across social media and streaming circles.
The livestream footage, which rapidly circulated on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and Instagram, showed a tense confrontation. An individual was seen lying on the Cybertruck’s bonnet, goading Clavicular to “start driving.” Moments later, the vehicle lurched forward, appearing to run over the person. The video’s rawness and ambiguity ignited fierce debate: was this an act of self-defense or reckless endangerment?
Witnesses at the scene, including security guards, voiced support for Clavicular, stating, “He’s a good guy. The one on the ground was the bad guy. He just did what he had to, at least your brother’s safe,” as reported by Lokmat Times. This narrative of self-defense was quickly echoed online, but was met with skepticism and concern from many viewers.
Shortly after the footage went viral, Clavicular’s Kick channel became inaccessible. Attempts to visit the page returned an error message, typical of account bans or suspensions. The platform itself did not issue a formal statement, leaving fans and critics alike to speculate about the reasons and process behind the ban.
Adding to the confusion, further clips from the same livestream surfaced. In one, Clavicular was seen speaking to a person in a reflective safety jacket. He explained his actions, saying, “You saw that? Bro, they were surrounding our car. Yeah, exactly, I can’t see s**t. Well, that’s why… when you’re afraid… well, I don’t know what’s going on.” He went on to allege that the people near the vehicle were armed, claiming he could see “a pistol” beneath their clothing. This account painted a picture of a young streamer caught in a moment of panic and uncertainty.
Rumors and misinformation swirled about the condition of the individual struck by the Cybertruck. Some sources, including an associate of popular streamer Adin Ross, confirmed that the person was not dead, as noted by Times of India and Tribune Pakistan. “Oh. He’s not dead. The girl just said he’s not dead,” the associate stated. Yet, there has been no official confirmation from law enforcement or medical authorities about the victim’s state or the precise sequence of events.
Adin Ross himself played a notable role in the aftermath, offering advice to Clavicular. During a live broadcast, Ross encouraged Clavicular to keep recording and to move his content to Instagram, but to avoid public commentary until the situation was clarified. Ross told him, “You need to be live for this. Okay? You need to be recording something. Don’t say anything. Don’t answer questions.” This guidance reflected the volatile nature of online scandals, where public perception can shift rapidly, and silence is often seen as a strategic move.
The event has reignited broader discussions about the culture of streaming and the responsibilities of platforms like Kick. Kick, already under scrutiny for hosting extreme content, faced renewed criticism for its moderation policies. Earlier in the year, French authorities had investigated the platform after a separate incident involving abuse and a tragic death on camera, as reported by Daily Mail.
Clavicular, whose real name is Braden Peter, has cultivated a substantial following across various social media platforms. His content often revolves around rating people’s attractiveness and promoting aggressive self-improvement routines. This blend of controversy and charisma has made him a lightning rod for attention—but also for criticism, especially in moments like this.
As of now, Clavicular has not made any public statements regarding the incident or his apparent ban. The Kick platform remains silent as well, and the full details of what transpired are still murky. What is clear is that the incident has sparked a reckoning—not only for the individuals involved but for the culture of livestreaming itself.
For now, viewers and followers are left with questions: Was Clavicular’s reaction justified? Did Kick act appropriately by banning him? And most importantly, what standards should streaming platforms uphold when real-life danger unfolds before thousands of viewers?
This incident underscores the urgent need for clearer guidelines and accountability in the fast-evolving world of livestreaming. When real life and digital performance collide, the consequences can be unpredictable—and, as this case shows, potentially life-changing. Until official details are released, all that remains is speculation and the reminder that the boundaries between entertainment and reality are thinner than ever.
Citations: Lokmat Times, Daily Mail, Times of India, Qoo10 Indonesia, Tribune Pakistan