H-1B Visa Shakeup: Tech Giants Adapt as $100K Fee Faces Legal Battle

Tech Giants Rethink H-1B Dependency Amid U.S. Crackdown

For decades, the H-1B visa has been the backbone of America’s tech innovation engine. From Silicon Valley’s startup stars to global IT powerhouses, the program has allowed thousands of skilled professionals from India, China, and beyond to bring their expertise stateside. But as the U.S. government turns a critical eye toward foreign worker programs, the landscape is shifting — and some of the biggest names in tech are recalibrating their strategies.

Leading the charge is Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the Indian IT giant that has long been one of the top recipients of H-1B visas. In a move that surprised many, CEO K Krithivasan recently announced that TCS will not hire new H-1B visa holders this fiscal year. Instead, the company is doubling down on building a stronger local workforce in the United States, a strategy shaped by tightening visa regulations and growing political scrutiny.

“We can survive without them,” Krithivasan declared, highlighting that only about 11,000 of TCS’s 32,000-plus U.S. employees are currently on H-1B visas. The rest, he says, are either locally hired or on other types of visas. The policy is not a simple swap to alternatives like L-1 visas, but a wholesale transformation of the company’s talent model. The shift is particularly visible in TCS’s numbers: last year, only 500 employees from India were sent to the U.S. on H-1B visas — a dramatic drop from previous years. (Business Standard)

The $100,000 Fee: Legal Challenge and Industry Impact

While TCS and other firms rethink their approach, a seismic legal battle is unfolding over the future of the H-1B program itself. In October 2025, a coalition of organizations and individuals filed suit against President Donald Trump’s proclamation requiring a $100,000 fee for new H-1B petitions. The lawsuit, Global Nurse Force et al. v. Trump, argues that the fee far exceeds presidential authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the case highlights deep anxieties among companies and workers alike. Many worry that such a steep fee will put skilled immigration out of reach for all but the wealthiest firms, shrinking the pool of global talent and threatening America’s competitive edge. Plaintiffs — ranging from nursing and academic organizations to unions and anonymous individuals — are seeking an injunction to prevent the enforcement of the fee and to have the proclamation declared unlawful. (JD Supra)

Central to their argument is the assertion that Congress, not the executive branch, sets the parameters of the H-1B program. The lawsuit also points to procedural flaws, such as the lack of clarity on how the fee would be collected and whether it applies to all new petitions or only to those for individuals currently outside the U.S. The White House has issued additional guidance, but major questions remain.

Industry Response: Local Hiring and Innovation

The ripples of these changes are being felt far beyond the courtroom. In the auto industry, for example, legal experts like Jim Aldrich and James Prappas of Dykema are helping companies navigate the new normal. The H-1B registration and lottery process has become more complex, and employers must stay vigilant about compliance with labor condition applications and other regulatory hurdles. The $100,000 fee, even if temporarily blocked, has already forced many to reconsider their hiring pipelines. (GlobalAutoIndustry.com)

For TCS and its peers, the shift toward local talent isn’t just a regulatory necessity — it’s a strategic evolution. Projects driven by artificial intelligence and rapid digital transformation require closer collaboration with clients and a deeper understanding of the U.S. market. These demands are best met by workers who are already embedded in the local context, prompting companies to invest in recruitment, training, and retention of domestic employees.

U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin have voiced concerns about the scale of H-1B employment at firms like TCS, sparking further debate about the program’s impact on American jobs. Krithivasan responded by clarifying that the majority of TCS’s visa activity involves extensions or modifications, not new hires, and that H-1B visas are no longer central to the company’s retention strategy. “It is far less of a retention tool than it once was,” he noted, emphasizing that the company’s evolving needs now favor local expertise.

H-1B Visas: Controversy and Contribution

The H-1B program has always been a lightning rod for debate. Supporters argue that it is essential for keeping America at the forefront of technology and innovation, pointing to high-profile beneficiaries like Elon Musk, Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella, and Zoom’s head Eric Yuan — all former H-1B holders who have helped transform U.S. industry. Roughly 60 percent of annual H-1B approvals go to computer-related jobs, making the program a lifeline for Silicon Valley and tech hubs nationwide. (newswav.com)

Critics, however, say the program displaces American workers and is vulnerable to abuse. The lottery system, cap limits, and shifting political winds make it a high-stakes gamble for applicants, who often wait years for a shot at the American dream. The Trump administration’s $100,000 fee proposal has only intensified these debates, with some arguing that it would cripple innovation while others see it as a necessary safeguard for domestic labor.

Prominent business leaders who started their U.S. journeys on H-1B visas have brought billions in economic value, founded companies, and created thousands of jobs. Their stories illustrate both the promise and the challenges of America’s approach to skilled immigration.

The Road Ahead: Uncertainty and Adaptation

The future of the H-1B program — and the global flow of talent it enables — hangs in the balance. If the $100,000 fee is upheld, many companies may scale back their sponsorships or shift focus entirely to local hiring. If the lawsuit succeeds, the status quo may be preserved, at least for now. Either way, tech firms and other employers are already preparing for a world where reliance on foreign talent is no longer guaranteed.

TCS’s pivot to local hiring is emblematic of a broader trend. As the rules evolve and the stakes rise, companies are seeking agility and resilience in their workforce strategies. The era of easy visa sponsorship may be ending, but the demand for top-tier talent — wherever it comes from — remains as fierce as ever.

Assessment: The current upheaval surrounding H-1B visas marks a critical inflection point for U.S. business and policy. As legal and regulatory battles unfold, the tech sector’s ability to adapt — by nurturing local talent and remaining open to global expertise — will determine whether America continues to lead in innovation or risks falling behind. The outcome of the $100,000 fee lawsuit will be a defining moment, not just for employers and workers, but for the future of American competitiveness itself.

Image Credit: inews.zoombangla.com