Quick Read
- Israel struck the South Pars complex for the second time, targeting 85% of Iran’s petrochemical export capacity.
- Tehran has formally rejected a 45-day ceasefire proposal, insisting on a permanent end to the conflict.
- U.S. President Donald Trump has issued a Tuesday deadline for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, threatening further infrastructure strikes.
ASALUYEH (Azat TV) – Israeli forces launched a major strike on the South Pars natural gas complex on Monday, April 6, 2026, marking a significant escalation in the conflict by targeting the bedrock of Iran’s energy sector. The attack on the facility at Asaluyeh follows a similar strike in mid-March, representing a deliberate shift from military and proxy-focused operations toward the systematic dismantling of Iranian economic infrastructure.
Strategic Targeting of Iran’s Energy Lifeline
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed the operation, describing the strike as a severe blow to the nation’s financial stability. According to official Israeli assessments, the South Pars facility and the related Mahshahr complex in Khuzestan province together accounted for approximately 85% of Iran’s total petrochemical exports. By rendering these sites inoperable, Israel aims to dry up a critical source of foreign currency reserves that sustain the Iranian state and its security apparatus.
The South Pars field is the world’s largest known natural gas reserve and serves as the primary engine for Iran’s domestic power grid and industrial output. Beyond export earnings, the complex provides the raw materials for essential goods ranging from fertilizers and plastics to household chemicals. Reuters and AP report that the loss of these facilities threatens not only the state’s revenue stream but also the basic electricity and heating supplies for millions of Iranian civilians.
Ceasefire Proposals and the ‘Tuesday Deadline’
The strike occurred against a backdrop of intense diplomatic pressure and a looming ultimatum from U.S. President Donald Trump. On Monday, reports emerged that regional mediators from Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey had presented a 45-day ceasefire proposal to both Washington and Tehran. The draft included provisions for the reopening of the strategic Strait of Hormuz and a temporary halt to hostilities.
While President Trump acknowledged the proposal as a “significant step,” he reiterated his ultimatum for Iran to reopen the shipping lane by Tuesday, warning that failure to comply could result in further strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure. Tehran has officially rejected the ceasefire terms, with state media insisting on a permanent end to the war and the lifting of international sanctions as a prerequisite for any further engagement.
Regional Implications and Escalation Risks
The decision to target South Pars has drawn sharp criticism from international observers, including European Council President Antonio Costa, who labeled the strikes on civilian energy infrastructure as “illegal and unacceptable.” Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that recent strikes occurred within 75 meters of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, raising concerns regarding the potential for radioactive contamination if industrial or nuclear infrastructure is further compromised.
As the regional energy market reacts to the closure of these facilities, countries dependent on Persian Gulf exports—most notably South Korea—are scrambling to secure alternative supply routes. The situation remains volatile as Tehran faces a dual crisis: a shrinking economic base and an intensifying military campaign that has now claimed the life of IRGC intelligence chief Majid Khademi.
The shift from targeting military assets to critical economic infrastructure marks an irreversible escalation that likely renders the current ceasefire proposal moot, as Iran is now facing an existential threat to its domestic stability and industrial viability.

