Quick Read
- The trial of 10 suspects in the 2016 Kim Kardashian Paris robbery began on April 28, 2025.
- The heist involved $10 million worth of jewelry, including a $4 million engagement ring.
- Several suspects, now in their 60s and 70s, are dubbed the ‘grandpa robbers.’
- Kardashian is expected to testify in May, nearly a decade after the incident.
- The trial seeks to uncover the fate of the stolen jewelry and the gang’s methods.
Background of the 2016 Paris Heist
On the night of October 2, 2016, Kim Kardashian, a globally recognized reality TV star, was robbed at gunpoint in her luxury Paris apartment during Paris Fashion Week. The robbers, disguised as police officers, tied her up and stole jewelry worth approximately $10 million, including a $4 million engagement ring given to her by then-husband Kanye West (now known as Ye). This incident, dubbed the ‘biggest robbery involving an individual in France in over 20 years,’ shocked the world and raised questions about celebrity security.
The ‘Grandpa Robbers’ and Their Methods
The suspects, now aged between their late 60s and early 70s, were nicknamed the ‘grandpa robbers’ due to their advanced age at the time of the crime. The group allegedly used ski masks, police uniforms, and zip ties to carry out the heist. They reportedly coerced the building concierge at gunpoint to lead them to Kardashian’s apartment, where they restrained her and demanded her valuables.
DNA evidence collected from the scene, including traces on the plastic bands used to tie Kardashian’s wrists, led to the arrests of the suspects in January 2017. Among them is Yunice Abbas, 71, who admitted his involvement and even authored a book detailing his role in the robbery. Another suspect, Aomar Ait Khedache, referred to as ‘Omar the Old,’ is accused of being the ringleader, a claim he denies.
The Trial: Key Details
The trial commenced on April 28, 2025, at the Court of Appeal in Paris. Ten individuals are being tried, with five facing charges of armed robbery and kidnapping, which could lead to life imprisonment. The remaining suspects are charged with complicity or unauthorized possession of weapons. Notably, one suspect has passed away, and another is too ill to stand trial.
Kardashian is expected to testify in May, providing her firsthand account of the traumatic event. Her testimony will likely shed light on the robbers’ actions and the psychological impact of the incident.
Unanswered Questions and the Fate of the Stolen Jewelry
One of the trial’s key objectives is to determine the fate of the stolen jewelry. While some items, such as a diamond-encrusted cross, were recovered, the majority, including the $4 million engagement ring, remain missing. Investigators believe that the jewelry was either melted down or sold in Antwerp, a global hub for diamond trading.
The trial also aims to explore how the robbers obtained detailed information about Kardashian’s whereabouts. Court documents suggest that her social media activity, which often revealed her location and schedule, played a significant role. Additionally, Gary Madar, an employee of a transportation firm used by the Kardashians, is accused of providing logistical information to the gang, a claim he denies.
Impact on Kardashian and Broader Implications
The robbery profoundly affected Kardashian, prompting her to reassess her public persona and approach to security. She temporarily withdrew from social media and later adopted stricter security measures. In interviews, she described the incident as a turning point that made her less materialistic and more cautious.
The case also highlights broader issues concerning celebrity security and the risks of oversharing on social media. Experts have pointed out that public figures often inadvertently expose themselves to threats by sharing real-time updates about their lives.
As the trial unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities even the most high-profile individuals face. The proceedings will likely provide closure for Kardashian and her family while addressing unanswered questions about the heist’s planning and execution. The outcome will also set a precedent for how such cases are handled in the future, particularly concerning the role of digital footprints in criminal investigations.

