Quick Read
- Simu Liu compared filming his new Peacock thriller, ‘The Copenhagen Test,’ to being on ‘Love Island.’
- In ‘The Copenhagen Test,’ Liu plays an intelligence agent whose fabricated romance is monitored by his agency.
- Liu stated that characters must convey both performance and genuine emotion to be compelling.
- ‘Love Island USA’ is a reality dating show on Peacock where contestants couple up under constant surveillance.
- Both ‘The Copenhagen Test’ and ‘Love Island USA’ highlight Peacock’s diverse content strategy, blending scripted and reality TV.
Simu Liu, the acclaimed actor known for his roles in blockbusters like ‘Barbie’ and ‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings,’ has offered a surprising comparison for his latest project, the Peacock sci-fi thriller ‘The Copenhagen Test.’ Liu revealed that the experience of filming the series, which sees his character embroiled in a monitored, fabricated romance, felt akin to being a contestant on the popular reality dating show ‘Love Island.’ This insight provides a fascinating look into the layers of performance and perceived reality within the show’s narrative, mirroring the unique dynamics of reality television itself.
The Premise of ‘The Copenhagen Test’
‘The Copenhagen Test’ is Peacock’s latest thriller offering, starring Liu alongside Melissa Barrera, known for her work in the ‘Scream’ franchise. The series delves into the high-stakes world of intelligence, following Liu’s character, an intelligence agent whose mind is hacked in a sophisticated effort to compromise his agency. As his superiors uncover the intricate predicament, they devise a counter-strategy: assign a fellow agent, played by Barrera, to pose as his girlfriend. The goal is to exploit the hack, using the fabricated romance to their advantage in tracking down the source of the breach.
This central plot device naturally leads to numerous romantic scenes, but with a critical twist. Both characters are acutely aware that their interactions are under constant surveillance, transforming their staged affection into a performance for unseen eyes. It is this very dynamic that prompted Liu’s intriguing ‘Love Island’ comparison, highlighting the deliberate artifice at the heart of their on-screen relationship.
Simu Liu on Blurring Reality and Performance
In a recent interview with Deadline, Liu, 36, elaborated on the unique challenges and intriguing aspects of portraying a romance under such watchful conditions. He shared his perspective with co-star Barrera, 35, noting, “I told [Melissa], it almost feels like being on Love Island.” This sentiment underscores the characters’ awareness that they are essentially starring in their own “reality TV show about finding love,” where their every romantic gesture is amplified and scrutinized for a hidden audience.
Liu further explained the intricate balance required for their performances. While the characters are knowingly “playing it up” for the cameras, there must also be an underlying authenticity to captivate viewers. “If that’s all it was, I don’t think that would be compelling for an audience to watch,” Liu stated. “There has to be an element of, the audience has to believe that part of that is real.” This belief, he contends, suggests that a genuine desire for connection exists within their characters, not just for the benefit of their mission, but also on a personal level. The complexity of these “layers to get to play” made Barrera an exceptional scene partner, according to Liu, as they navigated the nuanced portrayal of feigned intimacy that hints at deeper truths.
‘Love Island’: A Global Reality Phenomenon
To understand the depth of Liu’s comparison, one must look at the phenomenon that is ‘Love Island.’ Originating in the UK, the format has spawned numerous international versions, including ‘Love Island USA,’ which is available to stream on Peacock. The show is a quintessential reality dating competition where a group of single contestants, known as ‘Islanders,’ are isolated in a luxurious villa in a tropical location.
The core premise revolves around ‘coupling up.’ Islanders must pair off, either romantically or platonically, to avoid being eliminated from the show. Throughout the season, new Islanders are introduced, creating love triangles, dramatic re-couplings, and intense challenges designed to test their relationships and personalities. Viewers actively participate by voting for their favorite couples, influencing who stays and who leaves. The ultimate prize for the most compatible and popular couple is a significant cash sum, typically $100,000, which they must decide whether to split or keep for themselves.
Hosted by figures like Ariana Madix for ‘Love Island USA,’ the show thrives on manufactured drama, genuine emotional connections, and the constant pressure of being observed. Contestants are aware that cameras are always rolling, and their interactions, arguments, and romantic moments are broadcast to millions. This creates an environment where authenticity is often questioned, yet genuine feelings frequently emerge, making the line between performance and reality incredibly blurred – a parallel that Liu found strikingly similar to his experience on ‘The Copenhagen Test.’
Peacock’s Diverse Content Strategy
Both ‘The Copenhagen Test’ and ‘Love Island USA’ exemplify Peacock’s diverse content strategy, catering to a wide range of audience preferences. While ‘The Copenhagen Test’ represents the streamer’s push into high-concept, star-driven scripted thrillers, ‘Love Island USA’ anchors its robust offering of reality television. Peacock, which launched in July 2020, has quickly amassed a significant library, including hard-hitting journalism, true crime, popular sitcoms, and a plethora of reality TV options from networks like NBC, Bravo, and E!.
The platform aims to provide something for everyone, from critically acclaimed comedies like ’30 Rock’ and ‘The Good Place’ to intense dramas such as ‘Dr. Death’ and long-running procedurals like ‘Law & Order: Special Victims Unit.’ The inclusion of a globally popular reality franchise like ‘Love Island’ alongside sophisticated thrillers demonstrates Peacock’s commitment to a broad entertainment portfolio, attracting subscribers with both escapist reality and thought-provoking scripted narratives. This strategy allows the platform to capture different segments of the viewing public, ensuring a constant flow of fresh content that keeps audiences engaged, whether they are watching a spy play a fake romance or real people searching for love under surveillance.
The Psychological Resonance of Watched Relationships
The comparison drawn by Simu Liu between his scripted spy thriller and a reality dating show highlights a fascinating psychological resonance that permeates modern entertainment. In both scenarios, individuals are placed under intense scrutiny, their emotional and romantic lives becoming a spectacle. For the characters in ‘The Copenhagen Test,’ the act of performing a relationship is a tactical necessity, a means to an end. Yet, as Liu suggests, the constant simulation of intimacy can, and often does, lead to the development of genuine feelings, blurring the lines between their roles and their true selves.
Similarly, ‘Love Island’ contestants enter the villa knowing their every move is recorded and broadcast. While some may initially engage in strategic pairings or perform for the cameras, the sustained environment of enforced proximity and emotional vulnerability frequently fosters authentic connections. The audience, much like the fictional bosses in ‘The Copenhagen Test,’ becomes invested in deciphering what is real and what is staged, adding a layer of meta-commentary to the viewing experience. This shared element of a “watched relationship” serves as a powerful narrative device, whether it’s for espionage or entertainment, demonstrating the universal human fascination with observing the complexities of love and connection under pressure.
Simu Liu’s observation underscores how contemporary narratives, even in high-concept thrillers, are increasingly reflecting the pervasive influence of reality television, where the performance of emotion and the blurring of authentic and fabricated experiences have become central to audience engagement.

