Quick Read
- Typhoon Kalmaegi caused widespread destruction in Vietnam after devastating the Philippines.
- Sustained winds of up to 149 km/h (92 mph) wreaked havoc in central Vietnam.
- Over 260,000 soldiers were deployed for relief efforts, alongside evacuation of thousands.
- Record rainfall and saturated ground exacerbated flooding and landslides.
- Another typhoon, Fung-Wong, poses potential threats to the region.
Typhoon Kalmaegi has emerged as one of the deadliest cyclones of the year, leaving a trail of devastation in its wake. After wreaking havoc in the Philippines, the storm made landfall in Vietnam, bringing ferocious winds, torrential rains, and widespread destruction. With thousands evacuated and hundreds of soldiers deployed, the Vietnamese government is grappling with the aftermath of this natural disaster. This article delves into the storm’s impact, the relief efforts underway, and the challenges posed by the typhoon’s aftermath.
The Storm’s Trajectory and Impact
Typhoon Kalmaegi, locally known as Tino, struck Vietnam after devastating the Philippines, where it caused catastrophic damage and claimed hundreds of lives. When it made landfall in Vietnam’s Gia Lai province, the typhoon packed sustained winds of up to 149 km/h (92 mph). Heavy rains exacerbated the situation, particularly in central Vietnam, where saturated ground and swollen rivers amplified the risk of flooding and landslides.
Towns along Vietnam’s central coast were littered with debris, with uprooted trees, shattered windows, and collapsed buildings becoming common sights. Dak Lak province was among the hardest-hit areas, with hundreds of residents reporting their homes had either collapsed or been flooded. The storm’s ferocity was likened to previous disasters such as Typhoon Damrey, which struck Vietnam in 2017.
Evacuation and Relief Efforts
Anticipating the storm’s impact, Vietnamese authorities initiated large-scale evacuation efforts, moving thousands of residents from vulnerable coastal areas. The military deployed over 260,000 soldiers and personnel alongside 6,700 vehicles and six aircraft to assist with relief and rescue operations. Technology, including fly-cams, was employed to enhance search and rescue missions.
Public buildings such as schools and government facilities were repurposed as shelters for evacuees. Authorities also closed six airports, including Buon Ma Thuot and Lien Khuong, affecting hundreds of flights to ensure public safety. Despite these proactive measures, the storm caused significant disruptions, with many roads blocked by fallen trees and debris.
Environmental and Climatic Factors
One of the factors amplifying Typhoon Kalmaegi’s intensity was the unusually warm sea temperatures in the region, which fueled the storm and increased its moisture content. Scientists warn that as global temperatures rise, tropical cyclones are likely to become more intense, with heavier rainfall and stronger winds.
Central Vietnam, which had already experienced record rainfall in the weeks leading up to the typhoon, was particularly vulnerable. The saturated ground and high river levels created a perfect storm for widespread flooding. Forecasts predicted additional rainfall of 200-400mm, with localized areas possibly receiving up to 600mm.
Comparisons and Future Outlook
Typhoon Kalmaegi’s impact in Vietnam drew comparisons to its devastation in the Philippines, where flash floods obliterated poorer neighborhoods and caused mudslides in urban areas. The Philippines declared a national state of calamity to expedite relief efforts and prevent price gouging of essential goods. Similarly, Vietnam faces significant challenges in clearing debris, accounting for the missing, and rebuilding affected communities.
Adding to the region’s woes, meteorologists have warned of another typhoon forming in the Pacific, named Fung-Wong, which could potentially strike the Philippines and neighboring countries. This underscores the need for robust disaster preparedness and response mechanisms in Southeast Asia.
Typhoon Kalmaegi serves as a stark reminder of the destructive power of nature and the vulnerabilities of communities in its path. As relief efforts continue, the focus must remain on rebuilding resilient infrastructures and enhancing climate adaptation strategies to mitigate future risks.

