Quick Read
- Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old DOGE employee, resigns.
- His departure follows Elon Musk’s exit from DOGE in April.
- Coristine’s irreverent nickname became a meme in tech and politics.
- DOGE, tasked with slashing $2 trillion, faces uncertain future.
- Coristine’s tenure was marked by controversy and high-level access.
In a move as abrupt as his nickname, Edward ‘Big Balls’ Coristine, a 19-year-old wunderkind once touted as a rising star in federal tech overhaul, has resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The White House confirmed his departure earlier this week, marking yet another chapter in the unraveling of the Musk-led initiative to reimagine Washington bureaucracy.
A Name That Stuck—and Stirred Controversy
Coristine’s audacious nickname, ‘Big Balls,’ wasn’t a government codename but a relic from his high school antics. According to Fox Bangor, the moniker originated from a crude doodle during math class that a teacher accidentally brought to public attention. Coristine later embraced the name, making it his LinkedIn username—an ironic jab at the platform’s staid professionalism.
The irreverence didn’t end there. Coristine became a meme in both tech and political circles, embodying DOGE’s unapologetic disruption of federal norms. However, as Daily Mail reports, his brazen approach didn’t sit well with everyone. Critics, especially from liberal media and Democratic circles, questioned his qualifications and the ethics of granting a teenager such expansive access to government systems.
Musk’s Vision, Coristine’s Role
When Elon Musk took the helm of DOGE under Donald Trump’s administration, the department aimed high: cutting $2 trillion from the federal budget by slashing waste, selling assets, and terminating contracts. Coristine, a software developer and ex-Neuralink employee, joined as one of Musk’s early recruits. His role? Delve into Treasury Department payment systems and uncover inefficiencies and fraud.
In an interview last month with Jesse Watters on Fox News, Coristine recounted finding “$20 million line items with no explanation of where the money was going.” He described the payment systems as a “vector for fraud and waste,” echoing Musk’s ethos of radical transparency. Yet, as Wired notes, Coristine’s youth and unorthodox background raised eyebrows, even within the agency. His past affiliations with hacker groups and his penchant for bending norms made him a polarizing figure.
A Legacy of Disruption and Departures
Coristine’s resignation comes just weeks after Musk’s own departure in April, which sent shockwaves through the department. Steve Davis, Musk’s trusted lieutenant and president of The Boring Company, followed soon after, leaving DOGE in disarray. Insider sources quoted by Fox Bangor suggest that the vacuum of leadership has led to internal paralysis, with staffers quietly reassigned or leaving in droves.
While DOGE’s website claims $180 billion in savings to date—roughly $1,118 per taxpayer—its broader goal of $2 trillion in cuts remains far out of reach. Coristine’s exit adds to the perception that the once-ambitious program is now rudderless.
The Irreverent Operative
For all his bravado, Coristine’s tenure was far from smooth. According to Daily Mail, his name appeared in hacker forums, and he was briefly fired from cybersecurity firm Path Networks for allegedly leaking secrets. Yet, he managed to secure access to high-level meetings at federal agencies, from the Department of Defense to the Treasury. Such access, coupled with his controversial online persona, made him both an asset and a liability for DOGE.
Even his LinkedIn alias became a lightning rod for criticism and humor. In his Fox News interview, Coristine admitted he never expected the name to gain such notoriety. “People on LinkedIn take themselves too seriously,” he joked, adding that he wanted to challenge that culture.
What’s Next for DOGE?
With Musk, Davis, and now Coristine gone, the future of DOGE remains uncertain. While the White House insists the department will continue its work, insiders say its momentum has stalled. Critics argue that DOGE’s tech-bro culture and lack of oversight may have doomed the initiative from the start.
Perhaps the true legacy of DOGE lies not in its savings but in its audacity—a bold experiment in disruption that burned brightly and fizzled quickly.

