Quick Read
- US lawmakers released Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘birthday book’ containing messages from high-profile figures.
- An alleged note from President Trump has sparked controversy, with the White House denying its authenticity.
- The book also includes entries from Bill Clinton and Lord Mandelson, both expressing regret over ties to Epstein.
- The release has intensified calls for transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims.
The recent release of Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous ‘birthday book’ by the US House Oversight Committee has reignited public interest in the late financier’s connections to prominent figures. The 238-page scrapbook, compiled in 2003 to celebrate Epstein’s 50th birthday, has drawn intense scrutiny, particularly due to an alleged note from US President Donald Trump that the White House has vehemently denied.
The ‘Birthday Book’ and Its Controversial Contents
The ‘birthday book,’ titled “The First Fifty Years,” was reportedly organized by Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s close associate and co-conspirator, who was convicted in 2021 for her role in trafficking minors. It contains entries from Epstein’s friends, family, and business associates, often blending personal anecdotes with sexually explicit material. Among the contributors were high-profile figures such as former US President Bill Clinton, British Ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson, and others.
One of the most talked-about elements is a note allegedly signed by Donald Trump, featuring a drawing of a nude woman and a cryptic message reading, “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.” Democrats on the committee released an image of this note, claiming it proves Trump’s longstanding ties to Epstein. However, the White House has dismissed the note as a forgery. “President Trump did not sign or author this letter,” stated Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. The president has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, which initially reported on the note.
Additionally, the book includes a letter from Bill Clinton celebrating Epstein’s “childlike curiosity” and a handwritten message from Lord Mandelson referring to Epstein as his “best pal.” Both figures have expressed regret over their associations with Epstein, with Clinton’s spokesperson reiterating that the former president knew nothing of Epstein’s crimes.
Trump’s Legal and Political Fallout
The alleged Trump note has caused a political firestorm, with Democrats accusing the president of attempting to hide his ties to Epstein. Representative Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the Oversight Committee, stated, “President Trump called the Epstein investigation a hoax. Now we know he’s doing everything he can to cover up the truth.” Republicans, however, have rallied around Trump, with Representative Tim Burchett suggesting the note could have been created using an autopen, a device commonly used for replicating signatures.
Trump has maintained that his relationship with Epstein soured in the early 2000s when the financier allegedly poached staff from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort. Nonetheless, the timing of the note and its sexually suggestive nature have fueled speculation about their past association. Legal experts have pointed out that while the note alone does not implicate Trump in any wrongdoing, it adds to the growing calls for transparency regarding Epstein’s connections.
The controversy comes at a critical time for Trump, who is campaigning for re-election. His legal team has doubled down on efforts to discredit the note, presenting examples of the president’s signature to highlight discrepancies. “This is just another attempt to politicize a tragic case,” said Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich.
Broader Implications of the Document Release
The release of the ‘birthday book’ is part of a larger trove of documents subpoenaed from Epstein’s estate, including his will and a personal address book. These materials have reignited public interest in the Epstein case, particularly among his victims, who have long called for more transparency. “We deserve to know the full extent of Epstein’s network,” said one survivor during a recent press conference.
The Oversight Committee’s decision to release the documents has also sparked internal conflict. Republican Chairman James Comer criticized Democrats for “cherry-picking” information to politicize the case. “Our focus is on accountability and justice for survivors,” Comer stated. However, critics argue that both parties are using the revelations to score political points, detracting from the broader issue of justice for Epstein’s victims.
Among the more unsettling elements of the book are sexually explicit messages and images, as well as anecdotes that highlight Epstein’s predatory behavior. One entry compares him to the protagonist of Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, but instead of fish, Epstein “caught blonde, red, or brunette women.” Another contributor described “howling with laughter” after witnessing a degrading act involving a woman.
Unanswered Questions and Public Reactions
The release of the ‘birthday book’ has left the public with more questions than answers. How many other high-profile figures contributed to the book? What additional revelations could emerge from the remaining documents? And, perhaps most importantly, will this lead to any meaningful accountability for Epstein’s enablers?
As the controversy unfolds, it has highlighted the complexities of the Epstein case, where personal relationships, political power, and public accountability intersect. The pressure on lawmakers to release the so-called Epstein files in full continues to grow, with both survivors and the public demanding greater transparency.
The Epstein saga remains a stark reminder of the far-reaching consequences of unchecked power and privilege. Whether the release of the ‘birthday book’ will lead to substantive change or fade into another chapter of political theater remains to be seen.
The release of Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘birthday book’ underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability, not only for his victims but also for the public figures implicated in his network. The ongoing controversy serves as a test of political will and public resolve to confront uncomfortable truths.

