Greg Abbott Deploys National Guard to Austin Amid ‘No Kings’ Protests and Names New Higher Ed Ombudsman

In a week marked by both civic unrest and significant policy changes, Texas Governor Greg Abbott stands at the center of a storm that has national implications. On Thursday, Abbott made two major announcements that have sparked intense debate across the political spectrum: the deployment of National Guard troops to Austin ahead of the nationwide ‘No Kings’ protests, and the appointment of Brandon L. Simmons as the head of a newly created office to investigate complaints against higher education institutions in Texas.

Abbott Orders National Guard Ahead of ‘No Kings’ Protest

The streets of Austin are bracing for a wave of demonstrators as part of the ‘No Kings’ protests, a coordinated national movement opposing President Donald Trump’s administration and broader concerns about governmental overreach. According to CBS Texas, Abbott ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the National Guard to deploy personnel and tactical assets to the capital, citing the need to “maintain law and order.” The governor described the planned protest as “antifa-linked,” a characterization that has provoked criticism and skepticism from organizers and local officials.

Abbott’s statement was clear: “Violence and destruction will never be tolerated in Texas. Today, I directed the Texas Department of Public Safety and Texas National Guard to deploy all necessary law enforcement officials and resources to ensure the safety of Austin residents. Texas will deter criminal mischief and work with local law enforcement to arrest anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property.”

The DPS Homeland Security Division is closely monitoring the protest, as well as other potential demonstrations across the state. Law enforcement agencies are prepared to investigate any alleged links to terrorist organizations and to charge those who engage in unlawful activity. While protests are also planned for North Texas, local police departments in Dallas and Frisco reported that they had not received notifications about National Guard deployments in their cities.

Political Response and Divided Opinions

Abbott’s decision to send state forces to Austin was swiftly condemned by Democratic leaders and civil rights advocates. Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu likened the deployment to tactics used by “kings and dictators,” saying, “Sending armed soldiers to suppress peaceful protests is what kings and dictators do—and Greg Abbott just proved he’s one of them.” The protests, which are expected to take place in more than 2,600 locations nationwide, have been organized by groups such as the ACLU, College Democrats of America, and End Citizens United. Previous ‘No Kings’ rallies, including those in June, were overwhelmingly peaceful and saw little incident.

On the other hand, Republican figures, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, have characterized the demonstrations as “hate America” gatherings, accusing organizers of harboring radical “pro-Hamas” elements. This rhetoric has added further fuel to the already heated debate over the role of law enforcement and the right to protest.

Austin Mayor Kirk Watson responded with a measured statement, confirming that the National Guard will be on standby but “will not be on the streets of Austin unless there is a determination that there is an emergency need.” Watson emphasized the importance of protecting the right to peacefully assemble and expressed concern about the “militarization” of city streets, warning that destructive actions could undermine the legitimacy of the protests and provide justification for heavy-handed security measures.

“I support people exercising their right to engage in peaceful protest against politics and policies that they disagree with. Power should always stay with the people—where it belongs,” Watson said. “I share the belief in our democracy. I am committed—now more than ever—to stand against efforts to devalue and dismantle our democracy.”

Organizers and Law Enforcement Prepare for Saturday

The upcoming protest in Austin is being coordinated by Hands Off Central Texas, whose president, Sophia Mirto, challenged Abbott’s framing of the demonstration as “antifa-linked.” Mirto stated, “Everyone knows that Antifa is not an organization in the United States. Antifascism is an idea that is core to the identity of America as a country. Our grandfathers and grandmothers fought Nazis in Europe generations ago to make sure that America would be a democracy in good company of other Democratic nations around the world.”

Mirto also addressed the increased law enforcement presence, expressing hope that officers would enjoy the local music and encouraging participants to engage with the more than 50 organizations tabling at the event. She underscored the movement’s commitment to peaceful protest and constructive engagement.

The Austin Police Department, led by Chief Lisa Davis, echoed support for lawful assembly, noting the deployment of their Dialogue Police Team to assist demonstrators and ensure safety. “Austin has a proud history of peaceful assemblies, and we recognize the importance of open dialogue during these events,” Davis said. “We will work as needed with our law enforcement partners to support public safety and ensure events remain peaceful and orderly.”

As preparations continue, DPS has advised participants to plan ahead, bring essential items like water and phone chargers, and stay aware of their surroundings. The agency reiterated that Texans can report suspicious activities via the iWatchTexas app or hotline, with all reports kept confidential.

Abbott Names Brandon L. Simmons to Lead Higher Ed Oversight

Beyond the protests, Abbott announced another major initiative: the creation of a new office to investigate complaints against Texas higher education institutions. As reported by The Texas Tribune, Brandon L. Simmons, chair of Texas Southern University’s Board of Regents and a distinguished business professor, was appointed as Texas’ first higher education ombudsman. The office, established under Senate Bill 37, will have the power to investigate alleged violations of new laws and the state’s ban on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. It may also recommend funding cuts for institutions found in violation.

Senate Bill 37, which took effect on September 1, shifts significant authority to governor-appointed regents, allowing them to approve or deny the hiring of top university administrators and determine which courses align with state workforce needs. Critics, including the American Association of University Professors, warn that without robust due process protections, the ombudsman’s office could be “ripe for abuse.” The office will begin operations with five employees and Simmons’ appointment awaits confirmation by the Texas Senate.

Abbott praised Simmons as an accomplished educator and leader: “Brandon Simmons’ achievements and dedication to educate our future leaders as an entrepreneur, professor, and university chairman will help ensure Texas’ higher education institutions continue to set the national standard and prepare our students to thrive.” Simmons will step down from his current role at Texas Southern University, with Regent James Benham succeeding him as chair.

Looking Ahead: Public Safety, Academic Oversight, and Civic Engagement

This convergence of protest and policy underscores the complex challenges facing Texas in 2025. On one hand, the deployment of the National Guard and increased law enforcement presence reflect deep anxieties about public safety and political unrest. On the other, the establishment of a higher education ombudsman marks a significant shift in state oversight of academic institutions—potentially reshaping the landscape for faculty, students, and administrators alike.

As the ‘No Kings’ protests unfold, all eyes will be on Austin: will the demonstrations remain peaceful, or will heightened security provoke further tensions? Meanwhile, the higher education community is watching the implementation of SB 37 and Simmons’ new office, wary of its potential impact on academic freedom and institutional autonomy.

The facts reveal a Texas at a crossroads, balancing order and dissent, tradition and reform. Abbott’s actions—deploying troops and tightening oversight—signal a forceful approach to governance that both reassures and alarms, depending on one’s perspective. The coming days will test the state’s capacity for dialogue, accountability, and the peaceful exercise of democratic rights.