Quick Read
- Lois Openda joined Juventus from RB Leipzig in summer 2025 as a backup after the club failed to sign Randal Kolo Muani.
- Openda has yet to score for Juventus, while fellow new signing Jonathan David has only one goal since his debut.
- Both strikers have faced criticism for their lack of impact; Paolo Paganini publicly questioned their quality.
- Juventus management has decided not to sell Openda or David in January, hoping they will adapt and improve by season’s end.
Openda’s Turin Arrival: High Hopes, Harsh Reality
When Lois Openda landed in Turin last summer, optimism buzzed through the Juventus faithful. The Belgian striker, freshly arrived from RB Leipzig, was hailed as a shrewd—if last-minute—solution to the club’s ongoing search for firepower. Openda’s reputation as a hard-running, clinical finisher in the Bundesliga and his regular presence in the Belgian national team made him a compelling addition. But football, as always, has its own way of humbling even the most promising narratives.
Alongside Canadian forward Jonathan David, Openda formed part of Juventus’ ambitious attacking overhaul, orchestrated by CEO Damien Comolli. The club’s pursuit of Randal Kolo Muani had fallen through, leaving Openda as the backup plan. Yet, both new signings were expected to inject much-needed dynamism and goals into a side that had grown stale up front.
Early Struggles: The Numbers Tell the Story
But as the season approached its halfway mark, the optimism surrounding Openda began to evaporate. Despite his Bundesliga pedigree, Openda has yet to find the net in Juventus colors. Jonathan David, meanwhile, managed a debut goal against Parma—then fell silent, unable to add to his tally in subsequent matches.
The numbers are unflattering: between the two, only a single goal has been scored all season. For a club with Juventus’ ambitions, the drought is glaring. Dusan Vlahovic, the Serbian forward Juventus had tried to offload in the summer, has instead cemented his place as the number one striker, notching six goals and offering at least a semblance of reliability up front.
Public Criticism and Internal Dilemmas
The frustration has not remained behind closed doors. Italian journalist Paolo Paganini, never one to mince words, took to social media to voice his disappointment. “David and Openda combined don’t even make one top-level striker,” he wrote bluntly after Juventus’ 1-1 draw with Fiorentina. Paganini’s critique echoed a sentiment simmering among fans: the club’s summer transfer strategy, particularly in attack, had fallen flat.
Paganini’s criticism wasn’t limited to the forwards. He pointed out that the midfield’s lack of creativity and control was equally, if not more, problematic. Still, the spotlight remained fixed on Openda and David, whose late-game introductions suggested a lack of trust from manager Luciano Spalletti.
Club Response: Patience Over Panic
Despite the mounting pressure, Juventus have made it clear they are not about to cut their losses—at least not yet. According to La Gazzetta dello Sport (via JuventusNews24), the club’s leadership, particularly CEO Comolli, sees little sense in offloading either Openda or David midseason. The logic is pragmatic: a premature sale could further devalue the players, and the club remains hopeful that both will adjust and find their form as the campaign progresses.
For now, both strikers find themselves benched, with Vlahovic the undisputed starter. Other summer signings, like Edon Zhegrova and Joao Mario, have also struggled for minutes, putting additional scrutiny on Comolli’s overall summer business. Yet, the message from the boardroom is one of cautious patience: judge these players at the end of the season, not before.
The Broader Picture: Transition and Expectation
Juventus’ attacking woes are symptomatic of a club in transition. The summer revamp was meant to usher in a new era of youth and energy. Instead, it has exposed the challenges of integrating new signings into the high-pressure world of Turin, where patience is rarely afforded to those who fail to deliver.
Openda’s struggles cannot be viewed in isolation. The team’s midfield, as Paganini noted, lacks creativity and drive, making life harder for any forward. Service to the front line has been inconsistent, and the tactical adjustments under Spalletti are still bedding in.
Yet, for Openda, the clock is ticking. The unforgiving nature of top-tier football means opportunities to convince are limited. Each scoreless appearance adds to the narrative of disappointment, even as the club’s leadership urges supporters to look at the bigger picture.
Looking Ahead: Hope, Pressure, and the Need for Goals
As the January transfer window approaches, speculation is inevitable. But Juventus’ current stance is clear: Openda and David will remain until June, given the chance to prove their worth in the second half of the season. The club’s hope is that, with more time to adapt, the pair can rediscover the goal-scoring form that brought them to Turin in the first place.
For now, the story is one of frustration, but also of opportunity. If Openda can break his duck and start finding the net, the narrative could shift rapidly. Football, after all, is a game of small margins and sudden turnarounds.
The saga of Lois Openda at Juventus is a stark reminder that football transfers are rarely straightforward solutions. Even the most promising signings can falter under new pressures and systems. Juventus’ decision to resist panic and offer Openda more time is both a gamble and a statement of faith—one that could either pay off spectacularly or force a painful reckoning come summer. What is clear is that both club and player are now on the clock, and only goals will change the conversation.

