Court Rules Grand Jury Exceeded Authority
The Florida 1st District Court of Appeal (DCA) has ordered the full expungement of a Leon County grand jury presentment that accused state officials of misappropriating $10 million from a Medicaid settlement. The 19-page ruling, written by Judge Lance Neff, concluded that the grand jury exceeded its legal authority by naming and condemning individuals without returning any indictments. The court characterized the report as “careless in its grammar, mistaken in its law, and unfaithful to its own record.”
The controversy stems from a 2024 settlement between the state and the Medicaid provider Centene. The agreement involved a $67 million total resolution, of which $57 million went to the state and $10 million was directed to the Hope Florida Foundation. The foundation subsequently funneled grants to two nonprofit groups, which eventually donated the funds to a political committee chaired by then-Governor’s chief of staff James Uthmeier. The committee opposed ballot initiatives concerning recreational marijuana and abortion rights.
Legal Basis for Expungement
The appellate court identified two independent grounds for its order to expunge the document in its entirety. First, the court ruled that the grand jury lacked the power to declare the settlement arrangement illegal when no indictments were issued. Judge Neff clarified that because the settlement was reached before any civil action was filed, the statutes governing state settlements were not applicable. Furthermore, the court determined that the $10 million payment was never state property, as it moved directly from Centene to the Hope Florida Foundation.
Second, the court heavily criticized State Attorney Jack Campbell for the handling of the report. Under Florida law, individuals named in a grand jury presentment are entitled to a 15-day window to challenge the document before it is made public. The court found that Campbell violated this requirement by distributing the report via mass email to 49 recipients, including individuals with no connection to the case, before those named had the chance to seek suppression. Florida’s Voice reported that the court viewed this as an unauthorized disclosure of confidential material.
Political Stakes and Next Steps
The ruling marks a significant legal victory for the DeSantis administration. Jeremy Redfern, deputy chief of staff to Attorney General James Uthmeier, described the decision as a “complete and total victory” and a rejection of what he termed a “hoax.” The report had become a frequent point of criticism from political opponents during the campaign season. With the court’s order for full expungement, the document is expected to be removed from public record. The ruling is not considered final until the period for filing motions for rehearing has concluded, but it represents a definitive judicial rebuke of the grand jury’s procedural conduct and its interpretation of the state’s settlement laws.

